Perceived AI Fairness
About this scale
An 8-item measure of an employee or user's perception of fairness in AI-driven decisions, adapting Colquitt (2001) procedural and distributive justice items to algorithmic decision contexts (e.g., hiring, performance, lending). Captures whether outcomes are fair, procedures are bias-free, and explanations are adequate.
Sample item(s)
Reliability
Reported internal consistency: alpha 0.89. As a rule of thumb, Cronbach’s α ≥ .70 is considered acceptable, ≥ .80 good, and ≥ .90 excellent for established measures.
Notes
Lee (2018) is also widely used; both adapt classic justice items to algorithmic decisions.
Source & citation
Robert et al. (2020): Designing fair AI for managing employees. HCI, 35(5–6), 545–575.
Use it in your research
Need to check the reliability or psychometrics of this scale in your own data? Use the free DrAIStudio research tools: