Home › Scale Atlas › Leadership › Contingent Reward Leadership (Walumbwa et al.)

Contingent Reward Leadership (Walumbwa et al.)

LeadershipReliability: alpha 0.892 sample items

About this scale

A 4-item subscale measuring contingent-reward leadership — clarifying expectations and rewarding compliance, the most effective transactional behaviour.

Sample item(s)

“My supervisor makes clear what I can expect to receive when my performance goals are achieved”
“My supervisor rewards me when I do good work”

Reliability

Reported internal consistency: alpha 0.89. As a rule of thumb, Cronbach’s α ≥ .70 is considered acceptable, ≥ .80 good, and ≥ .90 excellent for established measures.

Notes

Free for academic use; CR-only short form alternative to full MLQ.

Source & citation

Walumbwa, F. O., Wu, C., & Orwa, B. (2008): Contingent reward transactional leadership, work attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior. Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 251–265.

Walumbwa, F. O., Wu, C., & Orwa, B. (2008): Contingent reward transactional leadership, work attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior. Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 251–265.

Source. Scale details are summarised from the publication cited above. Always consult the original source for the full item set, scoring, and permission to use.

Use it in your research

Need to check the reliability or psychometrics of this scale in your own data? Use the free DrAIStudio research tools:

Cronbach’s alpha calculator All statistical calculators Search the full Scale Atlas Academic writing humanizer

Related scales in Leadership

Related Leadership scales