Home › Scale Atlas › HR & Work › Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale (WEIMS)

Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale (WEIMS)

HR & WorkReliability: alphas 0.64–0.83 across 6 subscales3 sample items

About this scale

An 18-item measure of work motivation along the SDT continuum: intrinsic motivation, identified, introjected, external regulation, and amotivation.

Sample item(s)

“Because I derive much pleasure from learning new things (intrinsic)”
“Because it has become a fundamental part of who I am (identified)”
“Because I want to be very good at this work, otherwise I would be very disappointed (introjected)”

Reliability

Reported internal consistency: alphas 0.64–0.83 across 6 subscales. As a rule of thumb, Cronbach’s α ≥ .70 is considered acceptable, ≥ .80 good, and ≥ .90 excellent for established measures.

Notes

Free for academic use; modern SDT-based work motivation measure.

Source & citation

Tremblay, M. A., Blanchard, C. M., Taylor, S., Pelletier, L. G., & Villeneuve, M. (2009): Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale: Its value for organizational psychology research. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 213–226.

Tremblay et al. (2009): WEIMS. CJBS, 41(4), 213–226.

Source. Scale details are summarised from the publication cited above. Always consult the original source for the full item set, scoring, and permission to use.

How to administer & score it

All 18 items are typically rated on a Likert-type agreement scale (check the original article for the exact anchors — keeping them unchanged preserves comparability with published findings). This instrument is multidimensional: score each facet separately (the mean of its items) and only use a total score if the original validation supports one. Reporting facet-level results is usually more informative and is what reviewers expect. Include at least one attention check in longer surveys, and randomise item order within the scale block to reduce position effects.

In the original validation, reported internal consistency was alphas 0. Always re-estimate reliability in your own sample: report Cronbach's α (and, if you run CFA/SEM, composite reliability and AVE). An α noticeably below the published range usually signals a translation issue, careless responding, or a mis-scored reverse-coded item — not necessarily a bad scale.

Adapting this scale? A 5-point validity checklist

Frequently asked questions

Can I use the Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale scale in my research for free?
Most academic scales are free for non-commercial research use with proper citation, but permission terms belong to the original authors/publisher — check the source article (cited above) and request permission where indicated.

Do I need the full item wording?
Yes — always work from the original publication's item set rather than paraphrases, so your instrument matches the validated version. This page summarises the scale; the citation above is the authoritative source.

How do I build a questionnaire with this scale?
You can assemble it (with consent text, demographics, and attention checks) in the free SmartForm builder, then verify reliability live as responses arrive, and test your full model in SmartSEM.

Use it in your research

Need to check the reliability or psychometrics of this scale in your own data? Use the free DrAIStudio research tools:

Cronbach’s alpha calculator All statistical calculators Search the full Scale Atlas Academic writing humanizer

Related scales in HR & Work

Related HR & Work scales